Communication Technologies Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3500 words

Communication Technologies - Essay ExampleThen the honest side of the matter is discussed. Two theories are drawn (Utilitarian and Kantian) to find out is it moral to monitor companys personnel. The thirdly part of the paper is devoted to social responsibility. It is argued that a widespread use of monitoring techniques that intrude into employees unavowed life indicates the low level of social responsibility among employers, which in fact damages their own business. The segment also brings recommendations on how to improve privacy preservation within the company and explains what benefits a company leave alone receive.As the communication technologies continue to develop, the topic of workplace privacy becomes increasingly important. A hundred eld ago manager was able to monitor his subordinates only through visual observation and mail check, if a business was related to frequent use of post services. Later, with the spread of telegraphic communication the tension of employers move up up, although it was still very hard for employees to misuse business channels for private purposes. Thus, there was little deal in monitoring the use of business communication by personnel. Everything has changed with the development of phone, and posterior, netmail. With the ease of access to wear methods of communication, employers often use the chance to monitor their employees activity, justifying their actions as concern for productivity. From the employees side the monitoring of their phone calls and e-mail messages on the workplace is often perceived as the intrusion into privacy. Consequently, complaints of employees drive them to court bringing suits against their employees. So far around of such cases were resolved in favor of employers, as can be seen from examples illustrated later in the paper. The legal side of the matter of workplace privacy is observed in the next section. uprightness is on the Employers SideMost of the developed Western countries have a twofold legislation on the monitoring of employees workplace activity by employers. For example, in the US interception of wire and electronic communications is proscribe (Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18, USC 2511, 1986). However the same natural law has some exceptions, allowing employers to monitor business phones and emails of their employees in most of the casesIt shall not be unlawful under this chapter for a person acting under color of law to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication, where such person is a party to the communication or one of the parties to the communication has given prior take on to such interception. (Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18, USC 2511, 1986)Prior consent may be given all(prenominal) time an employee uses communication devices, or implied. Nevertheless, the fact that an employee merely knows that the employer has the aptitude to monitor telephone conversations is not sufficient to establish implied consent (Nutera ngelo, 2004). An employee must be aware of monitoring. Therefore, any employee that uses communication services belonging to employer is in the same party with his employer, allowing him to intercept every message or call. Moreover, each employee that was informed in some way (e.g. contract agreement) of using work phones or computers for